MQTT vs. Other Messaging Protocols: Advantages and Disadvantages

In the IoT (Internet of Things) world, where billions of devices are interconnected, messaging protocols are crucial in enabling efficient and reliable communication. One such protocol that has gained significant popularity is MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport). This blog will explore MQTT in detail, comparing it with other messaging protocols and highlighting its advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, we will touch upon Azure IoT Hub, a leading IoT platform that supports MQTT, to showcase its practical implementation.

MQTT – what is it?

MQTT is a lightweight, open-standard messaging protocol designed for resource-constrained devices and low-bandwidth networks. It follows a publish-subscribe architecture, allowing devices to publish messages to specific topics and subscribe to topics of interest. The protocol’s lightweight nature and minimal overhead make it ideal for IoT applications where conserving resources and reducing bandwidth usage are crucial.

1.2 MQTT Features and Functionality

MQTT offers several key features that contribute to its efficiency in IoT communication. It supports multiple Quality of Service (QoS) levels, allowing devices to choose the level of reliability and message delivery guarantees they require. MQTT also includes the concept of retained messages, which allows subscribers to receive the last known value of a topic even if they were not actively subscribed at the time of publication. Furthermore, MQTT libraries and client implementations are available for various programming languages, simplifying integration with IoT devices and applications.

1.3 MQTT and Azure IoT Hub

Azure IoT Hub, a comprehensive IoT platform provided by Microsoft, supports MQTT as one of its primary messaging protocols. By leveraging Azure IoT Hub with MQTT, developers can use the platform’s scalability, security, and management capabilities. MQTT integration with Azure IoT Hub enables efficient device-to-cloud and cloud-to-device communication, making it an ideal choice for IoT solutions built on the Azure ecosystem.

Comparison with Other Messaging Protocols

2.1 HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol)

While HTTP might be preferred for certain use cases, such as retrieving data from web APIs, MQTT shines regarding IoT communication. HTTP, a widely used protocol in web applications, operates on a request-response model, making it less suitable for real-time and asynchronous communication in IoT scenarios. In contrast, MQTT’s publish-subscribe architecture allows for efficient data streaming and real-time updates. MQTT’s lightweight nature also reduces network overhead and power consumption, making it more suitable for resource-constrained IoT devices.

2.2 CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol)

CoAP is another lightweight messaging protocol designed specifically for resource-constrained devices. While MQTT and CoAP share similarities in terms of lightweights and efficiency, they differ in their messaging models. MQTT follows a publish-subscribe model, whereas CoAP uses a request-response model. MQTT’s publish-subscribe architecture makes it well-suited for scenarios with multiple subscribers and scalable architectures, whereas CoAP is typically preferred for constrained IoT devices with limited network bandwidth or power constraints.

2.3 AMQP (Advanced Message Queuing Protocol)

AMQP is a protocol focused on reliable messaging in distributed systems. It offers more advanced features than MQTT, such as message acknowledgement, transactions, and complex routing patterns. However, AMQP’s additional complexity comes at the cost of increased overhead and higher resource consumption. MQTT, on the other hand, provides a lightweight and efficient alternative, making it a preferred choice for IoT applications where simplicity and low resource usage are key.

Advantages and Disadvantages of MQTT

3.1 Advantages of MQTT

MQTT offers several advantages, making it a popular choice in the IoT landscape. Its lightweight nature reduces network bandwidth usage and minimizes the power consumption of devices, extending their battery life. MQTT’s publish-subscribe model enables flexible and scalable architectures, allowing for easy integration of new devices and seamless communication between them. The support for different QoS levels ensures reliable message delivery based on the application’s specific requirements. Furthermore, MQTT’s retained messages feature allows subscribers to retrieve the last known value of a topic, ensuring data availability even when devices are offline or join the network later.

3.2 Disadvantages of MQTT

While MQTT offers numerous advantages, it is important to consider its limitations in certain scenarios. One potential drawback is the increased network traffic in environments with a high number of MQTT clients. This can lead to higher bandwidth consumption, especially if clients publish messages at high frequencies. Additionally, as with any communication protocol, security should be a priority. MQTT itself does not provide built-in encryption or authentication mechanisms, so it is essential to implement additional security measures to protect the data transmitted over MQTT.


MQTT has emerged as a leading messaging protocol for IoT applications, offering lightweight and efficient communication between devices. Its publish-subscribe architecture, support for different QoS levels, and retained messages feature make it well-suited for real-time data streaming and scalable IoT deployments. However, it’s important to evaluate the specific requirements of your IoT application and consider other messaging protocols such as HTTP, CoAP, or AMQP when appropriate.

In conjunction with MQTT, Azure IoT Hub provides a robust IoT platform that seamlessly integrates with MQTT for secure, scalable, and managed IoT solutions. By leveraging Azure IoT Hub with MQTT, developers can harness the power of the Azure ecosystem and take advantage of its features, including device management, analytics, and integration with other Azure services.


Q1: Can MQTT be used over the internet?

Yes, MQTT can be used over the internet. MQTT messages can be sent over TCP/IP connections, making it suitable for both local network and internet-based communication. However, it is important to ensure proper security measures such as data encryption and authentication when using MQTT over the internet.

Q2: Which programming languages have MQTT client libraries available?

MQTT client libraries are available for various programming languages, making integrating MQTT with different IoT devices and applications easier. Some popular programming languages with MQTT client libraries include Python, Java, JavaScript, C/C++, and .NET. These libraries provide the necessary APIs and functions to establish MQTT connections, publish messages, and subscribe to topics.

Q3: How does MQTT ensure message delivery reliability?

MQTT offers three levels of Quality of Service (QoS) to ensure message delivery reliability based on the specific needs of an application. QoS level 0 (at most once) provides the lowest reliability, where messages are sent once but are not guaranteed to be delivered. QoS level 1 (at least once) ensures that messages are delivered at least once, but duplicates may occur. QoS level 2 (exactly once) provides the highest reliability, ensuring that messages are delivered exactly once by implementing a handshake mechanism between the sender and receiver.

Q4: Can MQTT be used in mission-critical or safety-critical applications?

While MQTT is a lightweight and efficient messaging protocol, it may not be the ideal choice for mission-critical or safety-critical applications requiring strict message delivery or real-time constraints guarantees. In such cases, protocols with stronger reliability mechanisms and real-time capabilities, such as AMQP or specialized industrial protocols, might be more suitable.